Validation of the IMM classification in laparoscopic repeat liver resections for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: To validate the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification as a difficulty scoring system applicable to laparoscopic repeat liver resections and identify risk-factors of unexpected difficulty. METHODS: From a prospectively collected database between 2000 and 2019, patients undergoing laparoscopic repeat liver resections were classified according to the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification. Doubly robust estimators (weighted regressions) were used to assess the effect of factors on intra- and postoperative outcomes and allowed for strong adjustment on age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists, carcinoembryonic antigen, number, and size of lesions. Unexpected difficulty was defined as a composite indicator which included substantial blood loss and/or substantial operative time and/or conversion. RESULTS: Of 205 laparoscopic repeat liver resections patients, 87, 25, and 93 procedures were classified as grade 1, 2, and 3 laparoscopic repeat liver resections, respectively. After doubly robust adjustment, the IMM classification was associated with blood loss (Cohen f2 0.12; P = 0.001), operative time (Cohen f2 0.07; P = .001), and length of stay (Cohen f2 0.13; P = .001), as well as with the risk of both minor and severe complications (odd ratio = 2.94; 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.20) and the chances of achieving textbook outcome (relative risk = 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.81). Independently from the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification, a first major hepatectomy (relative risk = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.29) as well as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (relative risk = 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.41) were independent risk factors of unexpected difficulty. A first major resection was associated with decreased chances of textbook outcome (relative risk = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.85). CONCLUSION: The Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification is a valuable difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic repeat liver resections procedures, while previous major resection and presence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome are likely to jeopardize the outcomes.

Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: A procedure-based laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) classification (IMM classification) stratified 11 different LLR procedures into 3 grades. IMM classification assessed the difficulty of LLR differently than an index-based LLR classification (IWATE criteria), which scored each procedure on an index scale of 12. We validated the difference of 3 IMM grades using an external cohort, evaluated the IMM classification using the scores of the IWATE criteria, and compared the performance of IMM classification with the IWATE criteria and the minor/major classification. METHODS: Patients undergoing LLR without simultaneous procedures were selected from a prospectively maintained database at the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM cohort) and from the database of 43 Japanese institutions (JMI cohort). Surgical and postoperative outcomes were evaluated according to the 3 IMM grades using the JMI cohort. The 11 LLR procedures included in the IMM classification were scored according to the IWATE criteria. The area under the curves (AUCs) for surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In the JMI (n = 1867) cohort, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, and major complication rate were significantly associated with a stepwise increase in grades from I to III (all, P < 0.001). In the IMM (n = 433) and JMI cohorts, IMM grades I, II, and III corresponded to three low-scoring, two intermediate-scoring, and six high-scoring LLR procedures as per the IWATE criteria, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation among the IMM grades were significantly different: 3.7 ± 1.4 (grade I) versus 7.5 ± 1.7 (grade II) versus 10.2 ± 1.0 (grade III) (P < 0.001) in the IMM cohort and 3.6 ± 1.4 (grade I) versus 6.7 ± 1.5 (grade II) versus 9.3 ± 1.4 (grade III) (P < 0.001) in the JMI cohort. The AUCs for surgical and postoperative outcomes are higher for the 3-level IMM classification than for the minor/major classification. CONCLUSIONS: The difference of 3 IMM grades with respect to surgical and postoperative outcomes was validated using an external cohort. The 3-level procedure-based IMM classification was in accordance with the index-based IWATE criteria. The IMM classification performed better than the minor/major classification for stratifying LLR procedures.

Performance of a modified three-level classification in stratifying open liver resection procedures in terms of complexity and postoperative morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Traditional classifications for open liver resection are not always associated with surgical complexity and postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to test whether a three-level classification for stratifying surgical complexity based on surgical and postoperative outcomes, originally devised for laparoscopic liver resection, is superior to classifications based on a previously reported survey for stratifying surgical complexity of open liver resections, minor/major nomenclature or number of resected segments. METHODS: Patients undergoing a first open liver resection without simultaneous procedures at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston cohort) or the University of Tokyo (Tokyo cohort) were studied. Surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared among three grades: I (wedge resection for anterolateral or posterosuperior segment and left lateral sectionectomy); II (anterolateral segmentectomy and left hepatectomy); III (posterosuperior segmentectomy, right posterior sectionectomy, right hepatectomy, central hepatectomy and extended left/right hepatectomy). RESULTS: In both the Houston (1878 patients) and Tokyo (1202) cohorts, duration of operation, estimated blood loss and comprehensive complication index score differed between the three grades (all P < 0·050) and increased in stepwise fashion from grades I to III (all P < 0·001). Left hepatectomy was associated with better surgical and postoperative outcomes than right hepatectomy, extended right hepatectomy and right posterior sectionectomy, although these four procedures were categorized as being of medium complexity in the survey-based classification. Surgical outcomes of minor open liver resections also differed between the three grades (all P < 0·050). For duration of operation and blood loss, the area under the curve was higher for the three-level classification than for the minor/major or segment-based classification. CONCLUSION: The three-level classification may be useful in studies analysing open liver resection at Western and Eastern centres.

ANTECEDENTES: Las clasificaciones tradicionales de la resección hepática abierta (open liver resection, OLR) por número de segmentos resecados, no siempre se asocian con la complejidad quirúrgica y la morbilidad postoperatoria. El objetivo de este estudio fue comprobar si una clasificación de 3 niveles para estratificar la complejidad quirúrgica en función de los resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios, ideada originalmente para la resección hepática laparoscópica, es superior a las clasificaciones basadas en una encuesta descrita previamente para estratificar la complejidad quirúrgica de los procedimientos de OLR, nomenclatura menor/mayor, o número de segmentos resecados. MÉTODOS: Se estudiaron pacientes sometidos a una primera OLR sin otros procedimientos quirúrgicos concomitantes en el hospital MD Anderson (cohorte de Houston) o en la Universidad de Tokio (cohorte de Tokio). Se compararon los resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios entre 3 grados: I (resección limitada para el segmento anterolateral o posterosuperior y seccionectomía izquierda); II (segmentectomía anterolateral y hepatectomía izquierda); III (segmentectomía posterosuperior, seccionectomía posterior derecha, hepatectomía derecha, hepatectomía central y hepatectomía ampliada izquierda/derecha). RESULTADOS: En ambas cohortes de Houston (n = 1.878) y Tokio (n = 1.202), el tiempo operatorio, las pérdidas estimadas de sangre, y el índice de complejidad integral (comprehensive complication index) variaba en los 3 grados (todos P < 0,05) y aumentaba paso a paso desde los grados I a III (todos P < 0,05). La hepatectomía izquierda se asociaba con mejores resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios que la hepatectomía derecha, hepatectomía derecha ampliada, y seccionectomía posterior derecha, aunque estos cuatro procedimientos fueron categorizados como de complejidad intermedia en la clasificación basada en la encuesta. Los resultados quirúrgicos de las OLRs menores también variaron en los 3 grados (todos P < 0,05). Para el tiempo operatorio y la pérdida sanguínea, el área bajo la curva fue mayor para la clasificación de 3 niveles en el estudio actual, que para la clasificación menor/mayor o la clasificación basada en los segmentos. CONCLUSIÓN: La clasificación en 3 niveles puede ser útil en estudios que analizan las resecciones hepáticas abiertas en centros occidentales y orientales.

Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Proposal for a New Classification.

OBJECTIVE: We propose an objective and practical classification system to predict difficulty of different laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs). BACKGROUND: Surgical difficulty is highly subjective and is not influenced only by surgical factors. Consequently, few series have described the degree of difficulty of LLR or attempted to objectively assess the surgical difficulty. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database between 1995 and 2015, patients undergoing LLR without simultaneous procedures were selected, and LLR procedures were divided into 3 groups according to scores based on operative time (< or ≥190 minutes), blood loss (< or ≥100 mL), and conversion rate (< or ≥4.2%). RESULTS: Altogether, 452 LLRs were divided into 3 groups based on their scores. Group I (0 point) included wedge resection and left lateral sectionectomy. Group II (2 points) included anterolateral segmentectomy and left hepatectomy. Group III (3 points) included posterosuperior segmentectomy, right posterior sectionectomy, right hepatectomy, central hepatectomy, and extended left/right hepatectomy. The rates of overall morbidity (groups I, II, and III: 8.4%, 17.3% and 45.7%, respectively, P < 0.001) and major complications (1.1%, 4.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, P < 0.001) increased significantly with a stepwise increase of groups from I to III (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This objective and practical classification system allows the stratification of LLR comprising the low (group I), the intermediate (group II), and the high (group III) grades.

Standardizing terminology for minimally invasive pancreatic resection.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of literature pertaining to minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). Heterogeneity in MIPR terminology, leads to confusion and inconsistency. The Organizing Committee of the State of the Art Conference on MIPR collaborated to standardize MIPR terminology. METHODS: After formal literature review for "minimally invasive pancreatic surgery" term, key terminology elements were identified. A questionnaire was created assessing the type of resection, the approach, completion, and conversion. Delphi process was used to identify the level of agreement among the experts. RESULTS: A systematic terminology template was developed based on combining the approach and resection taking into account the completion. For a solitary approach the term should combine "approach + resection" (e.g. "laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy); for combined approaches the term must combine "first approach + resection" with "second approach + reconstruction" (e.g. "laparoscopic central pancreatectomy" with "open pancreaticojejunostomy") and where conversion has resulted the recommended term is "first approach" + "converted to" + "second approach" + "resection" (e.g. "robot-assisted" "converted to open" "pancreatoduodenectomy") CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines presented are geared towards standardizing terminology for MIPR, establishing a basis for comparative analyses and registries and allow incorporating future surgical and technological advances in MIPR.

Objective Surgical Skill Differentiation for Physical and Virtual Surgical Trainers via Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

This study proposes a methodology to objectively differentiate surgical skill for physical and virtual trainers by measuring functional activation between expert and novice surgeons. Results indicate that there is a significant increase in functional activation for novices in the right lateral prefrontal cortex, and decrease in the left medial primary motor cortex, and the supplementary motor area for the physical trainer (p<0.05). Results also indicate that there is a significant lower functional activation for novices compared to experts in the left medial primary motor cortex for the virtual skills trainer (p<0.05).

Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: a fine step forward.

Single incision laparoscopy (SIL) has become an emerging technology aiming at a further reduction of abdominal wall trauma in minimally invasive surgery. Available data is encouraging for the safe application of standardized SIL in a wide range of procedures in gastroenterology and hepatology. Compared to technically simple SIL procedures, the merit of SIL in advanced surgeries, such as liver or colorectal interventions, compared to conventional laparsocopy is self-evident without any doubt. SIL has already passed the learning curve and is routinely utilized in expert centers. This minimized approach has allowed to enter a new era of surgical management that can not be acceded without a fruitful combination of prudent training, consistent day-to-day work and enthusiastic motivation for technical innovations. Both, basic and novel technical specifics as well as particular procedures are described herein. The focus is on the most important surgical interventions in gastroenterology and aims at reviewing the current literature and shares our experience in a high volume center.

Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification.

BACKGROUND: According to the Louisville Statement, laparoscopic major hepatectomy is a heterogeneous category that includes "traditional" trisectionectomies/hemi-hepatectomies and the technically challenging resection of segments 4a, 7, and 8. The aims of this study were to assess differences in clinical outcomes between laparoscopic "traditional" major hepatectomy and resection of "difficult-to-access" posterosuperior segments and to define whether the current classification is clinically valid or needs revision. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected single-center database of 390 patients undergoing pure laparoscopic liver resection. A total of 156 patients who had undergone laparoscopic major hepatectomy according to the Louisville Statement were divided into two subcategories: laparoscopic "traditional" major hepatectomy (LTMH), including hemi-hepatectomies and trisegmentectomies, and laparoscopic "posterosuperior" major hepatectomy (LPMH), including resection of posterosuperior segments 4a, 7, and 8. LTMH and LPMH subgroups were compared with respect to demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: LTMH was performed in 127 patients (81 %) and LPMH in 29 (19 %). Operation time was a median 330 min for LTMH and 210 min for LPMH (p < 0.0001). Blood loss was a median 500 ml for LTMH and 300 ml for LPMH (p = 0.005). Conversion rate was 9 % for LTMH and nil for LPMH (p = 0.219). In all, 28 patients (22 %) developed postoperative complications after LTMH and 5 (17 %) after LPMH (p = 0.801). Mortality rate was 1.6 % after LTMH and nil after LPMH. Hospital stay was a median 5 days after LTMH and 4 days after LPMH (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of two subcategories of laparoscopic major hepatectomy seems appropriate to reflect differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between LTMH and LPMH.

[Laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcers].

It was done comparative analysis the results of different treatment options using of laparoscopic treatment of 331 patients with perforated ulcers. It was defined that postoperative complications frequency is increased to 1.6% in case of perforated ulcers suturing with diameter to 0.7 cm. This indication is increased to 7.1% in case of perforated ulcers suturing and plugging by greater omentum with holes diameter to 1.0 cm. The complications are absent in case of perforated ulcer excision with subsequent vagotomy and pyloroplasty.

Inter-rater concordance of wound classifications in patients undergoing appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread utilization of a four-stage wound classification system to risk-adjust operations for surgical site infection (SSI) rates, we are not aware of any study evaluating the definitions of the wound classes for clarity. We limited our study of wound classifications to appendectomies and posed the question whether different reviewers classify individual cases differently. METHODS: We evaluated the wound classifications of 105 consecutive appendectomies in our community hospital. Four reviewers graded retrospectively the wound classifications, first after reading the description of the appendix in the operative report and again after reading the pathology report. The wound classifications of the four reviewers were evaluated for concordance with the original operating room nurse (ORN) assignment. RESULTS: The kappa scores for inter-observer concordance of wound classifications among the four reviewers based on their interpretation of the operative report and the ORN who originally classified the operation ranged from 0.1028 to 0.1597. By conventional standards, this represents no better than "slight agreement" for any of the reviewers. We found that 19%, 50%, 94%, 95%, or 96% of our appendectomies would be considered "high risk," Class 3 or 4, operations depending on which rater classified the operation. The additional information contained in the pathology reports did not change the distribution of wound classifications of the four reviewers significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated considerable differences in the distribution of wound classifications of appendectomies among our ORNs and retrospective reviewers. A review of the surgical literature supports our finding that the incision classification system utilized commonly lacks precision, at least in the rating of appendectomies. We recommend that further studies be performed to determine whether changes in the definitions of wound classes are warranted.

Crioterapia laparoscópica retroperitoneal en tumor renal sincrónico bilateral / Retroperitoneal laparoscopic cryotherapy in bilateral, synchronous kidney tumor

No disponible

The use of magnets with single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery.

Single-site umbilical incision laparoscopic surgery (SSULS) is increasingly being used to treat a variety of childhood surgical diseases. Existing SSULS approaches have inefficient triangulation and poor ergonomics. In an effort to overcome these shortcomings, magnet-assisted laparoscopy was developed. Specialized magnetic graspers are introduced through a standard 12-mm port and are controlled by a powerful external magnet. This study is a retrospective analysis of all magnet-assisted laparoscopic operations performed at the Fundacion Hospitalaria Private Children's Hospital from September 2009 to January 2011. Outcomes include demographics, diagnosis, operative time, intraoperative complications, and conversion rates. Forty-four magnet-assisted laparoscopic operations were performed. The operations included 23 appendectomies, 8 cholecystectomies, 3 Nissen fundoplications, 2 gastrojejunostomies, 2 splenectomies, 2 ovarian tumor/cyst resections, 1 retroperitoneal lymphangioma resection, 1 left adrenalectomy, 1 total abdominal colectomy and 1 pulmonary wedge resection. The mean operative times for the most commonly performed operations were 61 minutes for appendectomy and 93 minutes for cholecystectomy. The operations were classified as follows: Group I, adjunct to conventional laparoscopy (5 operations); Group II, adjunct to multiple-access umbilical laparoscopy (11 operations); and Group III, true single-port laparoscopy (28 operations). Among Group II/III operations, 6 operations required 1 additional port outside the umbilicus. No operations required more that 1 additional port, and no operations were converted to the open technique. There were no intraoperative complications. Magnet-assisted laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective in children. The use of magnetic graspers improves triangulation and ergonomics while reducing the number and size of abdominal incisions.

Short- and long-term complications of open radical prostatectomy according to the Clavien classification system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the Clavien classification system in documenting the complications related to open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 995 patients, who had open RRP during a period of 7 years, were reviewed retrospectively. Short- and long-term complications were classified according to the recently revised Clavien classification system. We also compared the results with a recently reported series of laparoscopic and robotic RRP. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 26.9%; Grade I, Id, II, IIIa, IIIb and V complications were recorded in 3.4%, 3.9%, 12.8%, 2.6%, 3.8% and 0.3% of cases, respectively. Rectal injuries (10) and postoperative wound infections (24) were included in the Grade I category. Anastomotic leakage was recorded in 39 patients and rated as Grade Id. Grade II included cases of deep vein thrombosis (11), urinary tract infections (42), lymphorrhoeas (22) and haemorrhage requiring transfusion (53). Anastomotic strictures (26) and incisional hernias (38) were included in Grade IIIa and IIIb, respectively. Pulmonary embolism was fatal for three patients (0.3%) of Grade IV and V. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid incoherence in reporting morbidity data, a reproducible and practical classification system is necessary. The Clavien system could provide, after refinement and validation, a common language among urologists.

Hernia de acceso de laparoscopia / Laparoscopic por site hernia

No disponible

Virus del papiloma humano. Aspectos virológicos e inmunitarios / Human papilloma virus. Virological and immune features

No disponible

No disponible

Comparison of the different types of "laparoscopic total hysterectomy".

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the operative outcomes among different types of laparoscopic total hysterectomy (LH) classified according to the Munro and Parker classification system. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II). SETTING: 6 major public hospitals in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: 143 patients underwent LH in a 6-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Type I to type IV LH according to the Munro and Parker classification system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 56 type I, 49 type II, 25 type III, and 13 type IV LH. The median operative time was 105 minutes, which was significantly longer in the type IV LH group (160 minutes). The median blood loss was significantly higher in the type I LH group (300 mL). The incidence of urinary tract infection in type I LH was 8.9%, which was significantly higher than other LH groups. The overall operative complication rate was 20.3%, which was highest in the type III hysterectomy group (36%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance among the various types of hysterectomy groups. CONCLUSION: There has been a change from abdominal hysterectomy to LH in the past decades, and it is time for us to explore the best type of LH. Our findings suggest that type I LH is associated with significantly more blood loss and urinary tract infection; whereas type IV LH is associated with significantly longer operating time. However, we still cannot conclude which is the best type of LH until results from a randomized controlled trial will become available.